In 2016, Trudeau announced with fanfare that Canada was contributing $804 million to the Global Fund, a 24-per-cent increase to the international organization that aims to curb the three afflictions that are now widely seen as preventable with the proper amount of medical and financial support.
The increase in Canadian spending was in keeping with past bump-ups to the Global Fund’s replenishment drive every three years, both from the previous Conservative government of Stephen Harper and the Liberal governments before it.
But development officials in several organizations say they believe the government is simply planning to announce a repeat of 2016’s funding with no increase, which would be a first for Canada.
Chris Dendys, the executive director of Results Canada, a grassroots anti-poverty advocacy group, said that based on conversations that she and others in her sector have had with federal officials, the government is planning no increase because of a “cash crunch” heading into the fall election.
The Global Fund wants to see a 15-per-cent increase in total pledges this year, to US$14 billion.
A spokeswoman for International Development Minister Maryam Monsef said Canada respects the Global Fund and will announce its contribution in “due course.”
Canada recently announced at the Women Deliver conference in Vancouver that it will contribute $1.4 billion annually to 2030 to fund global health and nutrition, including sexual and reproductive rights and health, said Hanna Button, Monsef’s policy director.
“Our ongoing support to the Global Fund will be an important part of this holistic approach,” Button said in an emailed statement.
The Women Deliver funding is a reallocation of money from the current budget for international development.
“It’s really a matter of political will in an election year, or not an election year,” said Dendys, who noted that Canada’s overall spending on foreign aid has not been significantly increased under the Liberals to meet the United Nations target of 0.7 per cent of gross national income.
She said the spending has not increased “beyond the basement of 0.26 per cent of GNI. There’s been plenty of opportunities to do the right thing.”
Canada’s last Global Fund pledge came at an international conference that Trudeau hosted in Montreal in September 2016, a star-studded event that featured U2 singer Bono, who founded the anti-poverty advocacy group, the One Campaign.
France will host this year’s pledging conference in October, in the middle of Canada’s federal election campaign, so advocates want to see Canada take the lead and deliver its increased pledge before the election writ is dropped, to show leadership to other countries.
Two other G7 countries, Britain and Japan, recently announced increased pledges of almost 17 per cent and five per cent respectively.
“Other countries are starting to move in that direction,” said Dr. Julio Montaner, the director of the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS.
“My bottom line is we want Canada to be not just counted but playing a leadership role, making an early pledge and in doing so, providing an example to the rest of the world.”
Montaner’s research led to the medical breakthrough that controlled and reduced the spread of HIV-AIDS in the late 1990s: the “triple cocktail” of antiretroviral drugs that has been credited with reducing mortality across the globe.
The approach has been replicated worldwide, and is now the cornerstone of the work of the Global Fund, he said.
“I am very hopeful that Prime Minister Trudeau will make an executive decision in short order to do the right thing,” Montaner said.
“He promised me, privately, before the (2015) election that he would do so. He did so in writing … I hope that he will be consistent with that kind of approach when it comes to supporting the Global Fund.”
Montaner said that with reduced funding the fight against the spread of HIV-AIDS will be curtailed and that will mean more long-term financial burdens on health care across the world.
About one-third of the Global Fund’s spending targets women and girls through programs aimed at comprehensive sexual and reproductive health, said Stuart Hickox, the executive director of the Canadian branch of One.
“If Canada doesn’t increase its support, it’s essentially a retreat from its leadership. We asserted that space in 2016 as a global leader in this area,” said Hickox.
Dr. Mark Dybul, who was the executive director of the Global Fund from 2013 to 2017, said Trudeau showed great leadership in 2016, mobilizing youth and creating a great sense of optimism at the 2016 Montreal event.
“I understand the pressures on budgets but I think given the leadership Canada had, in particular with this same prime minister and because of the emphasis on girls and women, I think it would be unfortunate if they didn’t follow the trend of the other donors and show a leadership role,” said Dybul, the co-director of the Centre for Global Health Practice and Impact at Georgetown University Medical Centre in Washington.
Dendys said her organization has lobbied 30 MPs to push Trudeau to increase Canada’s support for the fund.
“What we’re hearing is Canada is going to keep its pledge to the Global Fund flat-lined, which really is a really a retreat in global leadership,” she said.
“Everyone we’ve spoken to has basically said, there’s just a cash crunch.”
Women and children are disproportionately affected by malaria and TB, which creates massive burdens on the health budgets of developing countries. Keeping up funding levels to help eradicate preventable diseases is in the economic interest of every country, especially with Africa’s population predicted to double by 2050, said Dybul.
“If they don’t have health, education and economic opportunity — you’re worried about refugees today? What do you think the world is going look like?” he said.
“It is necessary for the long-term growth of the global economy, Canada’s economy, and also so that we don’t have a continent collapsing.”